Andy Murray has had to defend the use of an underarm serve in his opening Wimbledon match. Photo: Andy Rain/EPA
London – Andy Murray has defended using an underarm serve in his Wimbledon opener on Monday, saying it was a legitimate way to make opponents think twice before standing too deep to return serve.
The two-time Wimbledon champion used the shot in the third set of his victory over James Duckworth on Centre Court, winning the point despite the Australian scrambling to get the ball back over the net.
"He changed his return position, that's why I did it," the Scot told reporters.
ALSO READ: Novak Djokovic aims to shed grasscourt rust after wobble in opening win
"He was struggling a little bit on the first-serve return, so he stepped probably two metres further back. As soon as I saw him step further back, I threw the underarm serve in."
A moment of mischief from @andy_murray 😉#Wimbledon | #CentreCourt100 pic.twitter.com/DM4rAfpVsD
— Wimbledon (@Wimbledon) June 27, 2022
Murray suggested the underarm serve might become more popular as players retreat further behind the baseline to improve their chances of getting a decent return on big serves.
"I personally have no issue with players using it. I never have," he added.
"Certainly more and more players have started returning from further, further behind the baseline now to give themselves an advantage to return.
"The underarm serve is a way of saying: 'If you're going to step back there, then I'm going to possibly throw that in'."
"I don't know how many more opportunities I'll get to play on this court so I want to make the most of it"@andy_murray reflects on his first round win over James Duckworth#Wimbledon | #CentreCourt100 pic.twitter.com/enaBP5bYdn
— Wimbledon (@Wimbledon) June 27, 2022
Murray said he never considered the tactic, more associated with Australian maverick Nick Kyrgios in recent years, a sign of disrespect for his opponent.
"I've never understood that. It's a legitimate way of serving," he said. "I would never use an underarm serve if someone was standing on the baseline because I think it's a stupid idea because they're going to track it down and it's easy to get.
"If they stand four or five metres behind the baseline, then why would you not do that to try to bring them forward if they're not comfortable returning there?
"Tactically it's a smart play."
Reuters