Griquas restore pride in Currie Cup despite big franchises' best efforts to stack the deck

I live in the Boland, a magical place. Not only do people here turn grapes into some of the finest wine and brandy on the planet, but our love for sport is unmatched.

The atmosphere around the Cavaliers’ home matches in the Currie Cup in Wellington was well documented, adding a new dimension to South Africa’s oldest rugby competition — one that has been on life support for some time.

Indeed, matches in Kimberley, Bloemfontein and even Pietermaritzburg, where the Sharks XV hosted fixtures, were also well attended. The Currie Cup seemed to rediscover a niche for itself in 2025, reclaiming a measure of relevance.

The competition’s standing and prestige have been eroded ever since SA Rugby’s shift northwards to align with European tournaments. Even before that, Super Rugby had already diminished its profile.

The northern move has strengthened South African rugby as a whole, but it has undoubtedly been to the detriment of the Currie Cup. Yet, midway through this year’s edition, the tournament rediscovered its purpose — as a competition rooted in community, uniting club rivals behind their provincial teams.

Then came the disruption. Just as things were getting interesting, the heavyweights muscled in.

The Lions and Stormers packed their Currie Cup squads with United Rugby Championship players in the build-up to their European campaign. Western Province, with nothing left to play for, still fielded their top stars against Boland, before the Lions followed suit in the semi-final against Hawies Fourie’s team.

Boland lost both matches and their Currie Cup dreams went up in smoke.

It was brutally unfair, exposing the shallow mess of the current system. But rugby, like life, has a way of evening itself out. Karma struck in the form of George Whitehead’s last-gasp penalty in Saturday’s final, sealing a famous win for Griquas against the Lions and ending their 55-year Currie Cup drought.

It was no fluke. Griquas were worthy winners. No parachuted stars, no late cavalry charges — just a group that lived the competition from round one through to the final whistle.

Contrast that with the Lions, who shifted the goalposts by throwing in their URC regulars when it suited them. That approach diminishes the Currie Cup’s integrity and disrespects the smaller unions who fight tooth and nail for every point.

The Currie Cup deserves more than to be treated as a convenient testing ground or a warm-up exercise. It deserves respect as a competition in its own right. This year, Griquas reminded everyone of that truth.

If South African rugby wants to preserve the tournament’s integrity, it must ensure a level playing field. That does not mean punishing the big unions, but it does mean protecting the smaller ones from being trampled once momentum has been built.

Griquas’ victory was more than a trophy win. It was proof of what the Currie Cup is meant to represent: guts, resilience, and the triumph of collective effort over individual stardom.

For once, the stacked deck was overturned. And for that, South African rugby should be grateful.