US Senator Edward Markey (R), D-Massachusetts, holds up a faulty General Motors ignition switch during a press conference with the family members of deceased drivers on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC, April 1, 2014, ahead of a House Energy and Commerce Committee hearing with the General Motors CEO. General Motors Chief Executive Mary Barra faces tough questioning in Congress on Tuesday over why the company ignored a faulty ignition problem for a decade despite numerous accident reports and 13 deaths. Also in the dock will be the US auto safety agency, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), under attack for not acting on its own evidence that the ignitions posed dangerous risks to drivers. AFP PHOTO / Jim WATSON US Senator Edward Markey (R), D-Massachusetts, holds up a faulty General Motors ignition switch during a press conference with the family members of deceased drivers on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC, April 1, 2014, ahead of a House Energy and Commerce Committee hearing with the General Motors CEO. General Motors Chief Executive Mary Barra faces tough questioning in Congress on Tuesday over why the company ignored a faulty ignition problem for a decade despite numerous accident reports and 13 deaths. Also in the dock will be the US auto safety agency, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), under attack for not acting on its own evidence that the ignitions posed dangerous risks to drivers. AFP PHOTO / Jim WATSON
Detroit, Michigan - General Motors' deadly ignition switch flaws emerged from an effort to improve its cars.
As the company began developing new small cars in the late 1990s, it listened to customers who complained about “cheap-feeling” switches that required too much effort to turn. A GM switch engineer testified in a lawsuit deposition in the second quarter of 2013 that the company set about making switches that would work more smoothly and give drivers the impression that they were better designed.
However, the switches were too loose, touching off events that led to at least 13 deaths, more than 50 crashes and a raft of legal trouble for GM.
Former US Attorney Anton Valukas, hired by GM in March to investigate the switch problems, told a congressional subcommittee in June GM wanted each small-car ignition to “feel like it was a European sports car or something.”
After years of lagging behind the Japanese, GM wanted to make better, more competitive small cars.
But as it turned out, the new switches in models such as the Chevrolet Cobalt and Saturn Ion can unexpectedly slip from “RUN” to “ACCESSORY,” causing engines to stall. That shuts off the power steering, making cars harder to control, and disables air bags in crashes. GM says the problem has caused at least 13 deaths, but some members of Congress put the death toll near 100.
The problem led GM to recall 2.6 million small cars in February, and forced the company to admit it knew about the switch troubles for more than a decade before taking action. It has touched off federal investigations and prodded GM to review other safety issues, leading to 54 recalls in 2014, covering 29 million vehicles.
GM switch engineer Ray DeGiorgio testified that he started out trying to make the switches easier to turn, but from the beginning he was consumed by electrical issues in the switch, not its mechanical parts.
When the switch supplier, Delphi, pointed out tests showing the switches turned too easily, DeGiorgio told Delphi not to change them because he was concerned mechanical alterations would harm the switch's electrical performance, according to Valukas.
Delphi spokeswoman Claudia Tapia has said the company will not comment on the details of GM's recall.
In the end, DeGiorgio approved switches that were far below GM's specifications for the force required to turn them. The result was a smooth-turning key, but also one that could slip out of position. Several years later, DeGiorgio signed off on a design change that fixed the problem, but he didn't change the part number, which stymied later attempts to figure out what was wrong with the cars.
Repeated efforts to reach DeGiorgio have been unsuccessful. He was one of 15 employees dismissed by the company in June due to the recalls. At a House subcommittee hearing GM boss Mary Barra didn't mince words when lawmakers asked her about DeGiorgio's statements to Valukas and congressional investigators.
“I don't find Mr DeGiorgio credible,” Barra said.
GM spokesman Greg Martin said Valukas' report cited several opportunities that the company missed to fix the problem before the switches went into production.
“It should never have happened regardless of what the reasons for changing the initial specifications for the switches were,” he said.
Subsequent safety reviews also found ignition switch troubles in other cars. The company has issued five recalls for 17.1 million cars with switch problems in 2014.
‘IT’S THE KEY, NOT THE SWITCH’
Among them are 3.4 million large cars such as the Chevrolet Impala, which had switches DeGiorgio worked on. GM says the combined force of a large bump and a swinging key chain can cause those switches to slip and stall the engine. GM is changing the key hole from a slot to a small circle to limit how much key chains can swing and tug on the ignition.
Unlike the Cobalt and Ion switches, GM says the ignition switches on the large cars meet its specifications, and the key design is the problem. GM says it conducted eight different driving tests with the new key and the ignition didn't move out of the “run” position in any of the tests.
But some experts believe the switches can still slip out of “RUN” too easily.
“They're finding that it's still possible for it to happen,” said Erin Shipp, a mechanical engineer who helped uncover the small-car ignition switch problems while working for attorneys suing GM.
AP